tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7354171578524044422.post7105236495600703158..comments2008-04-21T09:08:16.301+01:00David Farbeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802930753043960426noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7354171578524044422.post-38494932118239953902008-04-21T09:08:00.000+01:002008-04-21T09:08:00.000+01:00Hi David,<BR/><BR/>One of the funny things about Web 2.0 tools is that you basically can't plan user behaviour. I've set up a Ning network and invited some of the smart folks I've met as a professional (persons that couldn't meet otherwise), just to be there.<BR/><BR/>intersting discussions arose. They "stole" some time, but I think they provided some "unvaluable value" in return. It's a lot like "random seeding", if the soil is fertile something will grow.<BR/><BR/>AlbertoAlberto Brandolinihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00568728817611163214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7354171578524044422.post-59742386512637677372008-03-09T22:19:00.000Z2008-03-09T22:19:00.000ZQuality wise I understand your fears but a lot of the advantages of these social networks (if they work properly) is that they are self-correcting/governing. If someone posts something in error it is usually corrected by others.<BR/><BR/>As for quantity, yes it's an issue but I've learnt to not stress about things, I monitor too many 'things' for me to deal with, but I just check the MUSTS before the COULDS, and some months the SHOULDS never get a look in.. lolGordonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00858316092785787898noreply@blogger.com